CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Cherlynlavaughn Bradley

Scientist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ56634166 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cherlynlavaughn Bradley (October 27, 1951 – August 30, 2014) was an American chemist who worked at Amoco.

Early life and education

Bradley was born in Chicago, Illinois. Her father, Leroy Bradley, worked at Burlington Railroad and her mother, Geneva Bradley, was a musician. Bradley attended St Matthew's Catholic School and became interested in science when she was given a Gilbert Chemistry set. She took a course in advanced placement chemistry and went on to study chemistry and Illinois Wesleyan University. She was the only African-American student and graduated magna cum laude in 1973, and went on to study inorganic chemistry at graduate school. At Northwestern University, Bradley was, again, the only African-American woman in the department. She worked on polymer semiconductors and linear permethylpolysilanes. She earned her PhD in 1978.

Research and career

Bradley joined Standard Oil in 1977, which later became Amoco.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cherlynlavaughn Bradley” as scientist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cherlynlavaughn, Bradley and Scientist.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1951, 2014, 1973, 1978—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1951-10-27. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cherlynlavaughn, Bradley and Scientist providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cherlynlavaughn Bradley”, the useful work is to connect “scientist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q56634166. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1951, 2014, 1973 and 1978.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cherlynlavaughn Bradley”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cherlynlavaughn Bradley primary sources, Cherlynlavaughn Bradley archive and Cherlynlavaughn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cherlynlavaughn Bradley”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cherlynlavaughn Bradley” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.