CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Oxybasis rubra

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ17271894 ↗
Source-derived summary

Oxybasis rubra (until recently known as Chenopodium rubrum), red goosefoot, is an annual plant in the amaranth family. It is native to North America and Eurasia.

Description

Red goosefoot is a variable plant, an annual growing from just a few centimetres tall to as much as 1.5 m, usually erect but sometimes procumbent. It is sometimes quite fleshy plant, always glabrous, and usually green but sometimes red or, rarely, yellowish. The stems are ridged or angular and often branched, especially close to the base.

The leaves are alternate and roughly diamond-shaped, anything from 1 cm to 15 cm long, with a cuneate base and several lobes or large, blunt teeth. They can be quite succulent, especially in plants growing in brackish conditions. The petiole is about half as long as the basal leaves, shorter in the upper ones, and there is no stipule.

The inflorescence is essentially a spike with many dense glomerules, or ball-like clusters of flowers, interspersed with simple or leaf-like bracts. The flowers are of two types: the terminal ones being bisexual, with 4-5 perianth segments ("petals"), 4-5 stamens and 2 stigmas; the lateral ones are generally female with 3 perianth segments.

Editorial summary

“Oxybasis rubra” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Oxybasis, rubra and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 195-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Oxybasis, rubra and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Oxybasis rubra” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Oxybasis, rubra and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17271894. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Oxybasis rubra”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Oxybasis rubra primary sources, Oxybasis rubra archive and Oxybasis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Oxybasis rubra”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Oxybasis rubra” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.