CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chen Chi-nan

Taiwanese anthropologist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ8347862
Source-derived summary

Chen Chi-nan (Chinese: 陳其南; pinyin: Chén Qínán; Wade–Giles: Chʻên2 Chʻi2-nan2; born 29 October 1947) is a Taiwanese anthropologist. He led the Council of Cultural Affairs from 2004 to 2006. He was named Director of National Palace Museum in 2018 and served until 2019.

Early life and education

Chen was born in Pingtung County in 1947. He graduated from National Taiwan Normal University with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in geography in 1970 and obtained a master's degree in anthropology from National Taiwan University in 1975. Chen then won a Fulbright Program grant to pursue graduate studies in the United States, earning a Master of Arts (M.A.) in anthropology in 1978 and his Ph.D. in anthropology in 1984, both from Yale University. His doctoral dissertation was titled, "'Fang' and 'Chia-tsu': The Chinese kinship system in rural Taiwan".

Academic career

After receiving his doctorate, Chen worked as a researcher at the Academia Sinica and taught anthropology at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the University of Virginia. After returning to Taiwan, Chen joined the college of humanities and social sciences at National Chiao Tung University, where he later became dean.

Political career

Chen was named the vice chairman of the Council for Cultural Affairs from 1994 to 1997.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chen Chi-nan” as taiwanese anthropologist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chen, Chi-nan and Taiwanese.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1947, 2004, 2006, 2018—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1947-10-29, 1947—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chen, Chi-nan and Taiwanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chen Chi-nan”, the useful work is to connect “taiwanese anthropologist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8347862. VIAF identifies the subject as 114392113. The Library of Congress control number is n80147569. 1 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1947, 2004, 2006 and 2018.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chen Chi-nan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chen Chi-nan primary sources, Chen Chi-nan archive and Chen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chen Chi-nan”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Chen Chi-nan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.