CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chemosh

god of the Moabites, mentioned in Bible

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ1725600 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chemosh (Moabite: 𐤊𐤌𐤔‎, romanized: Kamōš; Biblical Hebrew: כְּמוֹשׁ, romanized: Kəmōš) is a Canaanite deity worshipped by Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples who occupied the region known as Moab, in modern-day Jordan east of the Dead Sea, during the Levantine Bronze and Iron Ages.

Chemosh was the supreme deity of the Canaanite state of Moab and the patron-god of its population, the Moabites, who in consequence were called the "People of Chemosh". The name and significance of Chemosh are historically attested in the Moabite-language inscriptions on the Mesha Stele, dated ca.

840 BCE. Chemosh is also mentioned in the Hebrew Bible.

Name

The name of Chemosh is attested in the Moabite language as 𐤊𐤌𐤔‎ (kmš), which was pronounced as Kamōš (/kaˈmoːʃ/).

The name of Chemosh is of yet uncertain origin, and it is unclear whether it was related to the name of the Eblaite deity ᴰKamiš (𒀭𒂵𒈪𒅖), or the Ugaritic divine name Ṯiẓẓu-wa-Kamāṯu (𐎘𐎑𐎆𐎋𐎎𐎘) or Ẓiẓẓu-wa-Kamāṯu (𐎑𐎑𐎆𐎋𐎎𐎘), or an epithet of the Mesopotamian god Nergal which might have meant "bull", ᴰKammuš (𒀭𒅗𒄠𒈲).

According to one hypothesis which assumes that the names ᴰKamiš and Kamāṯu, and Kamōš and ᴰKammuš were the same, the first two variants of the name might have been qattil-type substantival participles of B-stem and the latter two variants might have been qattul-type verbal adjectives of D-stem, both meaning "conqueror" and "subduer," thus being related to the Akkadian terms kanāšu (𒅗𒈾𒋗/𒅗𒈾𒋙) and kamāšu (𒅗𒈠𒀀𒋙)/kamāšu (𒅗𒈠𒋢), meaning "to submit to an overlord or to a deity" and "to bend," as well as to the Old South Arabian term hkms (𐩠𐩫𐩣𐩪), meaning "to crush."

Chemosh is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible under the name Kəmōš (כְּמוֹשׁ, vocalized as: [kǝˈmoːʃ]), which was vowelled following to the Hebrew word bəʾôš (בְּאשׁ), lit. 'stench'. The Hebrew form Kəmōš was itself later Romanised as Chemosh (vocalized in English as: ) in translations of the Bible, while the accurate pronunciation of the name of the god, reflecting the Moabite pronunciation Kamōš, is more accurately recorded in the Septuagint as Khamōs (Χαμώς) and the Vulgate as Chamos.

History

Origins

The origin of the Moabite deity Chemosh is unclear, although he might possibly have been the same as the Bronze Age-period god from Ebla named ᴰKamiš (𒀭𒂵𒈪𒅖), whose existence has been attested from around c. 2300 BC, thus suggesting that Chemosh might have been an ancient Semitic deity. The significant gap between the attestation of the Eblaite Kamiš during the 23rd century BC and that of the Moabite Chemosh in the 9th century BC, with an absence of any reference to either of these deities in Amorite names from the 21st to the 15th centuries BC, nevertheless make this identification between Kamiš and Chemosh very uncertain.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Chemosh” is god of the Moabites, mentioned in Bible. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chemosh, Moabites and mentioned, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 446-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Chemosh, Moabites and mentioned is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “god of the Moabites, mentioned in Bible” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1725600. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chemosh”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chemosh primary sources, Chemosh archive and Chemosh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chemosh”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chemosh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.