CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

ChemSusChem

peer-reviewed scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2025
Entity authorityQ2962251
Source-derived summary

ChemSusChem is a biweekly peer-reviewed scientific journal established in 2008 and published by Wiley-VCH on behalf of Chemistry Europe. The editor-in-chief is Leana Travaglini. The journal covers research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability, including contributions from materials science, chemical engineering, and biotechnology. It publishes full papers, communications, reviews, concepts, highlights, and viewpoints.

According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2024 impact factor of 6.6.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “ChemSusChem” is peer-reviewed scientific journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through ChemSusChem, peer-reviewed and scientific, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2008-01-01. For this dossier, ChemSusChem, peer-reviewed and scientific is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “peer-reviewed scientific journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2962251. 6 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2008 and 2024.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ChemSusChem”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ChemSusChem primary sources, ChemSusChem archive and ChemSusChem research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ChemSusChem”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ChemSusChem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.