CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Shaku (unit)

Japanese unit of length; today standardized as 10/33 metres

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ931805
Source-derived summary

The shaku (Japanese: 尺) or Japanese foot is a Japanese unit of length derived (but varying) from the Chinese chi, originally based upon the distance measured by a human hand from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the forefinger (compare span). Traditionally, the length varied by location or use, but it is now standardized as 10/33 m, or approximately 30.3 centimeters (11.9 in).

Etymology in English

Shaku entered English in the early 18th century, a romanization of the Japanese Go-on reading of the character for Japanese foot (尺, shaku).

Use in Japan

The shaku has been standardized since 1891 as 10⁄33 m, about 30.3 cm (11.93 in). This means that there are 3.3 shaku (33⁄10) to one meter.

This definition was established by Meiji government law; until then, even though the unit was given the same name, its length varied depending on the era. At the same time, other units were established based on shaku.

明治二十四年(1891年)三月二十四日法律第三號 度量衡法第四條 從來慣用ノ鯨尺ハ布帛ヲ度ルトキニ限リ之ヲ用ヰルコトヲ得鯨尺一尺ハ一尺二寸五分トシ其ノ十倍ヲ鯨尺一丈、十分ノ一ヲ鯨尺一寸、百分ノ一ヲ鯨尺一分トス

English:1Shaku = 10sun = 100bu

Japanese:1尺 = 10寸 = 100分

The use of the unit for official purposes in Japan was banned on March 31, 1966, although it is still used in traditional Japanese carpentry and some other fields, such as kimono construction. The traditional Japanese bamboo flute known as the shakuhachi ("shaku" and "eight") derives its name from its length of one shaku and eight sun. Similarly, the koku remains in use in the Japanese lumber trade.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Shaku (unit)” as japanese unit of length; today standardized as 10/33 metres. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Shaku, unit and Japanese.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1891, 1966—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Shaku, unit and Japanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Shaku (unit)”, the useful work is to connect “japanese unit of length; today standardized as 10/33 metres” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q931805. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1891 and 1966.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Shaku (unit)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Shaku (unit) primary sources, Shaku (unit) archive and Shaku research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shaku (unit)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Shaku (unit)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.