Chatoyancy
optical reflectance effect seen in certain gemstones

In gemology, chatoyancy ( shə-TOY-ən-see), also called chatoyance or the cat's-eye effect, is an optical phenomenon in which a narrow, luminous band of reflected light appears across the surface of certain gemstones. The band resembles the slit pupil of a cat's eye and appears to glide across the surface as the stone, the light source, or the observer moves. The same terminology is used also in wood science to describe the phenomenon happening in some valuable wood species, like genuine mahoganies, khaya, sapele, sipo etc.
The term derives from the French œil de chat ("cat's eye"). Although historically used primarily in gemology, analogous optical effects occur in other fibrous or anisotropic materials, including wood, where they are commonly described as a special wood figure, or even chatoyance.
Chatoyancy results from the directional reflection of light by parallel fibrous structures or aligned needle-like inclusions within a material. In tiger's eye, the effect is produced by parallel fibrous crystals, whereas in cat's-eye chrysoberyl it is caused by parallel microscopic inclusions or hollow tubes, commonly composed of or associated with rutile (titanium dioxide).
Description
Chatoyancy in the gemstone chrysoberyl is induced by the presence of the mineral rutile, a mineral primarily composed of titanium dioxide. These rutile precipitates align perpendicularly, contributing to the cat's eye effect. This alignment is attributed to the rutile's lattice parameter, which matches only one of the three orthorhombic crystal axes of chrysoberyl, leading to its preferred orientation in that direction.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Chatoyancy” is optical reflectance effect seen in certain gemstones. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chatoyancy, optical and reflectance, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “optical reflectance effect seen in certain gemstones” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1068275. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Chatoyancy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Chatoyancy primary sources, Chatoyancy archive and Chatoyancy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chatoyancy”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Chatoyancy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.