CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Charlotte de Robespierre

French writer (1760-1834)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ434212
Source-derived summary

Marie Marguerite Charlotte de Robespierre (French pronunciation: [ʃaʁlɔt d(ə) ʁɔbɛspjɛʁ]; 5 February 1760 – 1 August 1834) was a French writer and revolutionary. A Jacobin during the French Revolution, she is best known for the memoirs she dictated about the lives of her brothers, Maximilien Robespierre and Augustin Robespierre. She never married, and was described as respectable and entirely devoted to her brothers, to whom she was fiercely loyal.

Life

Born in Arras, she was the second child of François de Robespierre and Jacqueline Marguerite Carrault, the younger sister of Maximilien, and the elder sister of Henriette and Augustin Robespierre.

After the death of her mother, she and Henriette were both sent to live with their paternal aunts when her father left their home. They were given the typical education for middle- and upper-class daughters in pre-Revolutionary France, and were educated in a convent school in Tournai. Despite now living in separate homes and attending different schools, Charlotte still saw her siblings every Sunday, maintaining a close relationship with them. The death of her younger sister, Henriette, was quite hard for all three of them, especially Maximilien. In 1781, she left the convent school to live with her two brothers in Arras. In 1791, she led a campaign against Barbe-Therese Marchand's Affiches d'Artois, an anti-Jacobin newspaper.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Charlotte de Robespierre” as french writer (1760-1834). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Charlotte, Robespierre and French.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1760, 1834, 1781, 1791—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1760-02-05. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Charlotte, Robespierre and French providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Charlotte de Robespierre”, the useful work is to connect “french writer (1760-1834)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q434212. VIAF identifies the subject as 2499141. The Library of Congress control number is n89670706. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1760, 1834, 1781 and 1791.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Charlotte de Robespierre”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Charlotte de Robespierre primary sources, Charlotte de Robespierre archive and Charlotte research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Charlotte de Robespierre”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Charlotte de Robespierre” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.