CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Charles J. Halperin

American historian specialising in Rus' and Russian history

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ112547276 ↗
Source-derived summary

Charles J. Halperin (born 1946) is an American historian specialising in the high and late medieval history of Eastern Europe, particularly the political and military history of late Kievan Rus', the Golden Horde, and early Muscovy. Aside from several monographs, including three on Ivan the Terrible, over 100 articles of Halperin have been published.

Biography

Born in Brooklyn, New York City on 21 July 1946, Halperin studied history between 1963 and 1967 at Brooklyn College of the City University of New York (CUNY), obtaining a Bachelor of Arts. He went on to obtain a PhD in Russian history from Columbia University. In 1971–1972, a Fulbright–Hays Program scholarship allowed him to do research in the Soviet Union, where he expanded his knowledge of the Russian language and writings of Russian scholars. From 1972 to 1980, Halperin taught Russian history as assistant professor at the Department of History of Indiana University Bloomington. As a senior fellow of Columbia University's Russian Institute (since 1992 Harriman Institute) from 1980 to 1982, Halperin returned to the Soviet Union in autumn 1981 as part of a scientific collaboration agreement. In subsequent years, he worked as a computer instructor, programmer and system analyst, returning to Bloomington in 1996 as a Visiting Scholar at Indiana University's Robert F. Byrnes Russian and East European Institute.

Two of Halperin's most influential monographs have been Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History (1987 [1985]) and The Tatar Yoke: The Image of the Mongols in Medieval Russia (1986), in which he challenged several Moscow-centric, Great Russian, and Russian nationalist as well as Ukrainian nationalist traditions in historiography. These included the centuries-long tacit denial that the Mongols had really defeated and conquered Kievan Rus', and the false assertion that the Rus' princes were still constantly fighting against the invaders.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Charles J. Halperin” is american historian specialising in Rus' and Russian history. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Charles, Halperin and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1946, 1963, 1967, 1971—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1946. For this dossier, Charles, Halperin and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american historian specialising in Rus' and Russian history” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q112547276. VIAF identifies the subject as 41863147. The Library of Congress control number is n78023975. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1946, 1963, 1967 and 1971.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Charles J. Halperin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Charles J. Halperin primary sources, Charles J. Halperin archive and Charles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Charles J. Halperin”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Charles J. Halperin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.