CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Charles Bélair

Haitian revolutionary (1778–1802)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ99237580 ↗
Source-derived summary

Charles Bélair (1778 – 15 October 1802) was an aide-de-camp and close lieutenant of Toussaint Louverture during the Haitian Revolution. Bélair began his military career in the service of Spanish royalists under the command of Georges Biassou, later defecting to the French and eventually reaching the rank of Brigadier general and serving as Commandant of l'Arcahaie in the Haitian Revolutionary Army. He was also a nephew of Toussaint Louverture. In 1796, he married Sanite Belair.

Haitian Revolution

Bélair first enters the historical record on December 25, 1791, a few months after the events of August 22, when, along with his commander Biassou, he signed a letter of high political significance addressed to the abee de Lahaye. In the summer of 1794, he abandoned Biassou and the Spanish and followed Toussaint into the service of France. With the organization of the troops into demi-brigades in the spring of 1795, he was integrated into a battalion of the 7th Demi-Brigade, eventually becoming its leader, replacing Desrouleaux. During the War of the South, which he waged without excess of zeal, he remained in this post until the campaign in the East. Promoted to brigadier general in January 1801, he retained command of the port of Arcahaie. With the landing of General Leclerc's expeditionary forces, Bélair remained loyal to Louverture and took a defensive posture.

Editorial summary

“Charles Bélair” enters the record as haitian revolutionary (1778–1802). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Charles, Bélair and Haitian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1778, 1802, 1796, 1791—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Charles, Bélair and Haitian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Charles Bélair” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Charles, Bélair and Haitian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q99237580. VIAF identifies the subject as 49054273. The Library of Congress control number is no2008160577. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1778, 1802, 1796 and 1791.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Charles Bélair”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Charles Bélair primary sources, Charles Bélair archive and Charles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Charles Bélair”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Charles Bélair” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.