CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chapada do Araripe

plateau in northeastern Brazil

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ5072889 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Chapada do Araripe, also known as the Serra do Araripe, is a chapada (plateau) in northeastern Brazil. The chapada forms the boundary of Ceará and Pernambuco states, and forms the watershed between the Jaguaribe River of Ceará, which flows northward into the Atlantic, and the much larger basin of the São Francisco River of Pernambuco and neighboring states, which drains eastward into the Atlantic. The Santana Formation, which is rich with fossils from the early Cretaceous, lies at the base of the chapada.

Ecology

The landscape surrounding the Chapada is mostly Caatinga, a semi-arid shrubland and savanna that covers most of northeastern Brazil's interior. On the Chapada's northeastern slope is an enclave of tropical moist forest. Rainfall here exceeds 1000 mm annually, and the landscape is lush and green in contrast to the surrounding Caatinga. This moist forest enclave includes several forest types, mostly Atlantic semi-deciduous moist forest composed of four distinct layers. Emergent trees grow more than 30 m tall, above a canopy layer where species of legumes, mahogany, and family Apocynaceae predominate. The moist forests are mostly similar in composition to the Atlantic Forest, with some elements from the Amazon and Cerrado. Other plateau plant communities include dry forest and Cerrado subhumid savanna.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Chapada do Araripe” is plateau in northeastern Brazil. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chapada, Araripe and plateau, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Chapada, Araripe and plateau is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “plateau in northeastern Brazil” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5072889. VIAF identifies the subject as 235565491. Authority coordinates are -7.387, -40.216. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1000.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chapada do Araripe”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chapada do Araripe primary sources, Chapada do Araripe archive and Chapada research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chapada do Araripe”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chapada do Araripe” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.