CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chempakaraman Pillai

Indian revolutionary (1891-1934)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ3531043 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chempakaraman Pillai (alias Venkidi; 15 September 1891 – 26 May 1934) was an Indian-born independence activist and revolutionary. Born in Thiruvananthapuram, he left for Europe as a youth, where he spent the rest of his active life as an Indian nationalist and revolutionary.

Although his life was mired in controversies, including a squabble with Adolf Hitler, information on his life in Europe was sketchy in the immediate years after his death. More information has come out in recent years.

Chempakaraman Pillai is credited with the coining of the salutation and slogan "Jai Hind" in the pre-independence days of India. The slogan is still widely used in India.

Pillai, who started the Indian National Voluntary Corps on 31 July 1914, was instrumental in inspiring Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose to start the Indian National Army (INA).

Early life

Pillai was born into a Tamil Vellalar family in Thiruvananthapuram, capital of the erstwhile Kingdom of Travancore in the modern state of Kerala. His parents, Chinnaswami Pillai and Nagammal, hailed from Nanjinad (Then Travancore, present-day Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu). He left India in 1908 at the age of 17 with the help of a European.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chempakaraman Pillai” as indian revolutionary (1891-1934). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chempakaraman, Pillai and Indian.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1891, 1934, 1914, 1908—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1891-09-15, 1890-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chempakaraman, Pillai and Indian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chempakaraman Pillai”, the useful work is to connect “indian revolutionary (1891-1934)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3531043. VIAF identifies the subject as 23698239. The Library of Congress control number is n88176527. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1891, 1934, 1914 and 1908.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chempakaraman Pillai”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chempakaraman Pillai primary sources, Chempakaraman Pillai archive and Chempakaraman research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chempakaraman Pillai”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chempakaraman Pillai” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.