CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Chamaecytisus cassius

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ109882124 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chamaecytisus cassius is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae. It is native to South Turkey and the territories of Lebanon and Syria.

Description

Shrub, typically 6–10 feet tall, leaves trifoliate. Seed pods begin appearing in June.

Taxonomy

Chamaecytisus cassius was first described by Pierre Edmond Boissier in 1849 as Cytisus cassius, but has since been transferred to the genus Chamaecytisus by German botanist Werner Rothmaler in 1944 and published under its current binomial name.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chamaecytisus cassius” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chamaecytisus, cassius and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1849, 1944—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chamaecytisus, cassius and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chamaecytisus cassius”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q109882124. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1849 and 1944.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chamaecytisus cassius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chamaecytisus cassius primary sources, Chamaecytisus cassius archive and Chamaecytisus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chamaecytisus cassius”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chamaecytisus cassius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.