CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

ChaHα8

star in the constellation Chamaleon

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ5065918
Source-derived summary

ChaHα8 (also written ChaHa8 when Greek letters are unavailable) is a binary brown dwarf about 640 light-years (200 parsecs) from Earth in the constellation Chamaeleon. The designation indicates that it is in the Chamaeleon I star-forming region and that it displays hydrogen-alpha emission. It was discovered in 2000.

It was found in 2007 to have a low-mass substellar companion in orbit around it via radial velocity observations. The companion has a mass of 25–31 Jupiter masses, and the pair orbit each other with a period of 5.2 years and an eccentricity of 0.59.

Editorial summary

“ChaHα8” enters the record as star in the constellation Chamaleon. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what ChaHα8, star and constellation can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around ChaHα8, star and constellation.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“ChaHα8” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, ChaHα8, star and constellation provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5065918. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000 and 2007.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ChaHα8”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ChaHα8 primary sources, ChaHα8 archive and ChaHα8 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ChaHα8”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ChaHα8” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.