CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Isotopes of caesium

isotopes of caesium

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ24638
Source-derived summary

Caesium (55Cs) has 41 known isotopes, ranging in mass number from 112 to 152. Only one isotope, 133Cs, is stable. The longest-lived radioisotopes are 135Cs with a half-life of 1.33 million years, 137Cs with a half-life of 30.04 years and 134Cs with a half-life of 2.0650 years. All other isotopes have half-lives less than 2 weeks, most under an hour.

Caesium is an abundant fission product (135 and 137 are directly produced) and various isotopes are of concern as such, see the sections below.

Beginning in 1945 with the commencement of nuclear testing, caesium radioisotopes were released into the atmosphere, where caesium is absorbed readily into solution and is returned to the surface of the Earth as a component of radioactive fallout. Once caesium enters the ground water, it is deposited on soil surfaces and removed from the landscape primarily by particle transport. As a result, the input function of these isotopes can be estimated as a function of time.

List of isotopes

Caesium-131

Caesium-131 decays purely by electron capture to the ground state of stable xenon-131 with a half-life of 9.69 days; its detectable radiation is the X-rays of xenon, with a maximum energy of 34.5 keV. It was introduced in 2004 for brachytherapy by Isoray.

Caesium-133

Caesium-133 is the only stable isotope of caesium.

Editorial summary

“Isotopes of caesium” enters the record as isotopes of caesium. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Isotopes, caesium and isotopes can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1945, 2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Isotopes, caesium and isotopes.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Isotopes of caesium” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Isotopes, caesium and isotopes provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24638. The Library of Congress control number is sh85022201. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1945 and 2004.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of caesium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Isotopes of caesium primary sources, Isotopes of caesium archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of caesium”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Isotopes of caesium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.