CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

César Daneliczen

Brazilian cyclist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ25687966 ↗
Source-derived summary

César Daneliczen (born 16 August 1962) is a Brazilian former cyclist. He competed in the team time trial at the 1988 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

“César Daneliczen” enters the record as brazilian cyclist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what César, Daneliczen and Brazilian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1962, 1988—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1962-08-16. Its strongest next move is a source search built around César, Daneliczen and Brazilian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“César Daneliczen” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, César, Daneliczen and Brazilian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25687966. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1962 and 1988.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “César Daneliczen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow César Daneliczen primary sources, César Daneliczen archive and César research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “César Daneliczen”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “César Daneliczen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.