CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cerebus phonebook

Paperback collections

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ5064118 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cerebus phonebooks are the paperback collections in which Dave Sim has collected his comic book series Cerebus since 1986. They have come to be known as "phonebooks" as their thickness and paper stock resemble that of telephone directories. The format had a large influence on alternative comics publishing and was key in the move from the periodical-centric publishing style that was once dominant.

History

Swords of Cerebus

Starting in 1981, Sim started collecting the Cerebus stories in Swords of Cerebus. Swords collected four issues per volume, each with a backup story and new cover.

High Society

High Society had been conceived as one complete story, but Sim had not originally planned for it to be published as one volume. He did so more as an expedient:

I have arrived at this decision for a number of reasons (a) the difficulty involved in keeping each volume of Cerebus in print at all times, (b) the convenience of being able to introduce new fans to Cerebus with two large volumes and (at most) two dozen back issues, (c) a manageable format for someday having all 300 issues available, (d) the opportunity to expand Cerebus' exposure by making it available in bookstores.

Sim published it as one 512-page trade paperback volume in 1986. It was offered exclusively through mail order and sold out its 6000-copy print run within a year. Its success convinced Sim to drop the Swords collections and republish their contents as one volume as well.

Editorial summary

“Cerebus phonebook” enters the record as paperback collections. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cerebus, phonebook and Paperback can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 1981—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cerebus, phonebook and Paperback.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cerebus phonebook” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cerebus, phonebook and Paperback provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5064118. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1986 and 1981.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cerebus phonebook”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cerebus phonebook primary sources, Cerebus phonebook archive and Cerebus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cerebus phonebook”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cerebus phonebook” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.