CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cercophonius queenslandae

species of scorpion

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ2946580 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cercophonius queenslandae is a species of scorpion in the Bothriuridae family. It is native to Australia, where it occurs in eastern Queensland. It was first described in 1990 by Luis Acosta.

Editorial summary

“Cercophonius queenslandae” enters the record as species of scorpion. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cercophonius, queenslandae and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1990—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cercophonius, queenslandae and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cercophonius queenslandae” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cercophonius, queenslandae and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2946580. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1990.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cercophonius queenslandae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cercophonius queenslandae primary sources, Cercophonius queenslandae archive and Cercophonius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cercophonius queenslandae”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cercophonius queenslandae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.