CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Axonopus singularis

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ24700120
Source-derived summary

Axonopus singularis is a species of flowering plant in the grass family Poaceae, native to Brazil (the states of Maranhão and Goiás). When placed in the monotypic genus Centrochloa as Centrochloa singularis, it was the only species.

Taxonomy

The species was first described by Jason Richard Swallen in 1935 as Centrochloa singularis. It was the only species in the monotypic genus Centrochloa. It was transferred to the genus Axonopus in 2012, a placement accepted by Plants of the World Online as of November 2024.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Axonopus singularis” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Axonopus, singularis and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1935, 2012, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Axonopus, singularis and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Axonopus singularis”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q24700120. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1935, 2012 and 2024.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Axonopus singularis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Axonopus singularis primary sources, Axonopus singularis archive and Axonopus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Axonopus singularis”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Axonopus singularis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.