CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Central Organization for Statistics

Iraq's principal government institution in charge of statistics and census data

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ14065310
Source-derived summary

The Commission Statistics and GIS (COSIT) or the Commission Statistics and GIS (COS, Arabic: هيأة الاحصاء ونظم المعلومات الجغرافية) is the Government of Iraq's statistics agency. It has its headquarters in Hay Al-Elwiya, Baghdad.

Editorial summary

“Central Organization for Statistics” enters the record as iraq's principal government institution in charge of statistics and census data. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Central, Organization and Statistics can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 34-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Central, Organization and Statistics.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Central Organization for Statistics” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Central, Organization and Statistics provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14065310. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Central Organization for Statistics”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Central Organization for Statistics primary sources, Central Organization for Statistics archive and Central research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Central Organization for Statistics”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Central Organization for Statistics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.