CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Smartphones and pedestrian safety

pedestrian focused on their smartphone

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ24901351
Source-derived summary

Safety hazards have been noted due to pedestrians walking slowly and without attention to their surroundings because they are focused upon their smartphones. Texting pedestrians may trip over curbs, walk out in front of cars and bump into other walkers. The field of vision of a smartphone user is estimated to be just 5% of a normal pedestrian's.

Some cities have taken design measures to make the streets safer for inattentive pedestrians, including lights embedded in pavements, and dedicated lanes for smartphone-using pedestrians to use.

The pejorative term smartphone zombie has been used to describe inattentive phone users; this phrase was sometimes blended to Smombie in German and has seen some English usage. In Hong Kong such phone users are called dai tau juk ("the head-down tribe"). A 2017 review considered the popular culture term in regards to the medical diagnoses of internet addiction disorder and other forms of digital media overuse.

Pedestrian phone use

A 2012 study at twenty intersections in Seattle, USA, found 14% of pedestrians were talking or texting on a phone. A 2018 study of more than two thousand pedestrian observations at four intersections, one in New York City and three in Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, found 9% of pedestrians were talking or texting on a phone while crossing; in contrast to the previous study, this study did not find that phone usage altered walking speed.

In 2016 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons created a "Digital Deadwalkers" awareness campaign, in response to the risks associated with walking across intersections and sidewalks while paying attention only to smartphones and not one's surroundings.

Editorial summary

“Smartphones and pedestrian safety” enters the record as pedestrian focused on their smartphone. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Smartphones, pedestrian and safety can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2012, 2018, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Smartphones, pedestrian and safety.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Smartphones and pedestrian safety” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Smartphones, pedestrian and safety provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24901351. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017, 2012, 2018 and 2016.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Smartphones and pedestrian safety”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Smartphones and pedestrian safety primary sources, Smartphones and pedestrian safety archive and Smartphones research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Smartphones and pedestrian safety”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Smartphones and pedestrian safety” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.