CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Cecilia Dahlman

Swedish tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ2943714 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cecilia Dahlman (born 24 July 1968) is a retired Swedish tennis player, who played professionally between mid 1980s and 1993.

Tennis career

Cecilia Dahlman won two WTA singles titles during her career, the Athens Open in 1989 and 1990. She also represented Sweden in the Fed Cup.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cecilia Dahlman” as swedish tennis player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cecilia, Dahlman and Swedish.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1968, 1993, 1989, 1990—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1968-07-24. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cecilia, Dahlman and Swedish providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cecilia Dahlman”, the useful work is to connect “swedish tennis player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2943714. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1968, 1993, 1989 and 1990.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cecilia Dahlman”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cecilia Dahlman primary sources, Cecilia Dahlman archive and Cecilia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cecilia Dahlman”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cecilia Dahlman” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.