CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cecilia Ceccarelli

Italian astrophysicist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ27805716 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cecilia Ceccarelli is an Italian astronomer known for her research on astrochemistry and the spectroscopy of protostars. She was named as the female scientist of the year in the 2006 Irène Joliot-Curie Prizes.

Ceccarelli completed her Ph.D. in 1982 at Sapienza University of Rome. She has been associated with the Institut de planétologie et d'astrophysique de Grenoble in France since 2003.

She was elected to the Academia Europaea in 2024.

Editorial summary

“Cecilia Ceccarelli” enters the record as italian astrophysicist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cecilia, Ceccarelli and Italian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 1982, 2003, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cecilia, Ceccarelli and Italian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cecilia Ceccarelli” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cecilia, Ceccarelli and Italian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27805716. VIAF identifies the subject as 211137859. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1982, 2003 and 2024.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cecilia Ceccarelli”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cecilia Ceccarelli primary sources, Cecilia Ceccarelli archive and Cecilia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cecilia Ceccarelli”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cecilia Ceccarelli” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.