CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Caudron G.2

1914 single-engined French biplane

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ60788323
Source-derived summary

The Caudron G.2 was a single-engined French biplane built by Caudron, used in World War I as a reconnaissance aircraft and trainer.

Development

The outbreak of World War I precipitated the need for military applications of the successful Caudron Type G, leading to the creation of the G.2. The Caudron G.2 had a short crew nacelle, with a single engine in the nose of the nacelle, and an open tailboom truss. It was of sesquiplane layout, and used wing warping for lateral control. The wings of the Caudron had scalloped trailing edges that were to become a trademark of the aircraft.

Operational history

Ten Caudron G.2s were produced, with five being assigned to Escadrille Caudron Monoplace 39, four being delivered to the Australian Flying Corps, and one going to the Royal Naval Air Service.

Specifications

Data from French aircraft of the First World WarGeneral characteristics

Crew: 1 or 2

Length: 12.1 m (39 ft 8 in)

Wingspan: 7.25 m (23 ft 9 in)

Wing area: 28 m2 (300 sq ft)

Gross weight: 400 kg (882 lb)

Powerplant: 1 × Gnome Monosoupape 9 Type B 9-cylinder air-cooled rotary piston engine\, 60 kW (80 hp)

Propellers: 2-bladed fixed-pitch propeller

Performance

Maximum speed: 106 km/h (66 mph, 57 kn)

Rate of climb: 2.76 m/s (543 ft/min)

See also

Related development

Caudron G.3

Caudron R.4

Caudron R.11

References

Donald, David, ed. (1997). The Encyclopedia of World Aircraft. Aerospace Publishing.

Editorial summary

“Caudron G.2” enters the record as 1914 single-engined French biplane. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Caudron, single-engined and French can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Caudron, single-engined and French.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Caudron G.2” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Caudron, single-engined and French provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q60788323. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Caudron G.2”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Caudron G.2 primary sources, Caudron G.2 archive and Caudron research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Caudron G.2”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Caudron G.2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.