CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cauchy–Schwarz inequality

a useful inequality encountered in many different settings, such as linear algebra, analysis, probability theory, vector algebra and other areas. It is considered to be one of the most important inequalities in all of mathematics

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ190546 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality (also called Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz inequality) is an upper bound on the absolute value of the inner product between two vectors in an inner product space in terms of the product of the vector norms. It is considered one of the most important and widely used inequalities in mathematics.

Inner products of vectors can describe finite sums (via finite-dimensional vector spaces), infinite series (via vectors in sequence spaces), and integrals (via vectors in Hilbert spaces). The inequality for sums was published by Augustin-Louis Cauchy (1821). The corresponding inequality for integrals was published by Viktor Bunyakovsky (1859) and Hermann Schwarz (1888). Schwarz gave the modern proof of the integral version.

Statement of the inequality

The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality states that for all vectors

u

{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }

and

v

{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }

of an inner product space

where

⟨

⋅

,

⋅

⟩

{\displaystyle \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle }

is the inner product. Examples of inner products include the real and complex dot product; see the examples in inner product. Every inner product gives rise to a Euclidean

ℓ

2

{\displaystyle \ell _{2}}

norm, called the canonical or induced norm, where the norm of a vector

u

{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }

is denoted and defined by

‖

u

‖

:=

⟨

u

,

u

⟩

,

{\displaystyle \|\mathbf {u} \|:={\sqrt {\langle \mathbf {u} ,\mathbf {u} \rangle }},}

where

⟨

u

,

u

⟩

{\displaystyle \langle \mathbf {u} ,\mathbf {u} \rangle }

is always a non-negative real number (even if the inner product is complex-valued).

By taking the square root of both sides of the above inequality, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality can be written in its more familiar form in terms of the norm:

Moreover, the two sides are equal if and only if

u

{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} }

and

v

{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }

are linearly dependent.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Cauchy–Schwarz inequality” as a useful inequality encountered in many different settings, such as linear algebra, analysis, probability theory, vector algebra and other areas. It is considered to be one of the most important inequalities in all of mathematics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1821, 1859, 1888—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Cauchy, Schwarz and inequality can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as a useful inequality encountered in many different settings, such as linear algebra, analysis, probability theory, vector algebra and other areas. It is considered to be one of the most important inequalities in all of mathematics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q190546. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1821, 1859 and 1888.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cauchy–Schwarz inequality”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cauchy–Schwarz inequality primary sources, Cauchy–Schwarz inequality archive and Cauchy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cauchy–Schwarz inequality”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cauchy–Schwarz inequality” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.