CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Catmull–Clark subdivision surface

technique in 3D computer graphics

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ1051211
Source-derived summary

The Catmull–Clark algorithm is a technique used in 3D computer graphics to create curved surfaces by using subdivision surface modeling. It was devised by Edwin Catmull and Jim Clark in 1978 as a generalization of bi-cubic uniform B-spline surfaces to arbitrary topology.

In 2005/06, Edwin Catmull, together with Tony DeRose and Jos Stam, received an Academy Award for Technical Achievement for their invention and application of subdivision surfaces. DeRose wrote about "efficient, fair interpolation" and character animation. Stam described a technique for a direct evaluation of the limit surface without recursion.

Recursive evaluation

Catmull–Clark surfaces are defined recursively, using the following refinement scheme.

Start with a mesh of an arbitrary polyhedron. All the vertices in this mesh shall be called original points.

For each face, add a face point

Set each face point to be the average of all original points for the respective face

For each edge, add an edge point.

Set each edge point to be the average of the two neighbouring face points (A,F) and the two endpoints of the edge (M,E)

A

+

F

+

M

+

E

4

{\displaystyle {\frac {A+F+M+E}{4}}}

For each original point (P), take the average (F) of all n (recently created) face points for faces touching P, and take the average (R) of all n edge midpoints for original edges touching P, where each edge midpoint is the average of its two endpoint vertices (not to be confused with new edge points above).

Editorial summary

“Catmull–Clark subdivision surface” enters the record as technique in 3D computer graphics. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Catmull, Clark and subdivision can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Catmull, Clark and subdivision.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Catmull–Clark subdivision surface” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Catmull, Clark and subdivision provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1051211. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1978 and 2005.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Catmull–Clark subdivision surface”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Catmull–Clark subdivision surface primary sources, Catmull–Clark subdivision surface archive and Catmull research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Catmull–Clark subdivision surface”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Catmull–Clark subdivision surface” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.