CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Catherine Story

artist (born 1968)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ5052931
Source-derived summary

Catherine Story (born 1968) is an artist living and working in London. Story studied at Royal Academy Schools.

In October 2009, Story had her first solo exhibition Pylon in London at the Carl Freedman Gallery, followed by a second solo show Angeles in November, 2011 of new paintings and sculpture.

In 2013, Story exhibited at Tate Britain in 'Painting Now'. In 2018, Story had a solo show 'Shadow' at the PEER in London.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Catherine Story” is artist (born 1968). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Catherine, Story and artist, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1968, 2009, 2011, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1968-01-01. For this dossier, Catherine, Story and artist is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “artist (born 1968)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5052931. VIAF identifies the subject as 308181317. The Library of Congress control number is no2014047156. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1968, 2009, 2011 and 2013.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Catherine Story”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Catherine Story primary sources, Catherine Story archive and Catherine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Catherine Story”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Catherine Story” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.