Caroline Garcia
French tennis player
Caroline Garcia (French pronunciation: [kaʁɔlin ɡaʁsja]; born 16 October 1993) is a French former professional tennis player and current podcaster and YouTuber. She had a career-high singles ranking of world No. 4 by the WTA, achieved on 10 September 2018 and a best doubles ranking of No. 2, reached on 24 October 2016. She has won a total of nineteen WTA Tour titles, eleven as a singles player and eight in doubles.
Garcia's most notable achievements in singles were the 2022 WTA Finals title and her three WTA 1000 level trophies, namely the 2017 Wuhan Open, 2017 China Open and 2022 Cincinnati Open. She was also a two-time major champion in doubles, having won the French Open women's doubles title in 2016 and 2022 with countrywoman Kristina Mladenovic. The pair were also runners-up at the 2016 US Open, reached the semifinals at the 2017 Australian Open and were champions at the 2016 Madrid Open. As a result of that successful partnership, they qualified for the WTA Finals on two occasions and were voted the 2016 WTA Doubles Team of the Year.
Garcia represented France in the Fed Cup since 2013, and was part of the team that won the title in 2019.
“Caroline Garcia” enters the record as french tennis player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Caroline, Garcia and French can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Caroline Garcia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Caroline, Garcia and French provides the most credible route into that argument.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q258877. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2018, 2016 and 2022.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Caroline Garcia”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Caroline Garcia primary sources, Caroline Garcia archive and Caroline research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Caroline Garcia”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Caroline Garcia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.