CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Karl Philipp Fohr

German painter (1795-1818)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ77762 ↗
Source-derived summary

Karl Philipp Fohr (26 November 1795 – 29 June 1818), a brother of Daniel Fohr, was a German painter, born at Heidelberg in 1795.

Life and education

Fohr started his studies of painting with Friedrich Rottmann, and was largely self-taught. In 1810 he was discovered by the painter Georg Wilhelm Issel, who invited him to Darmstadt in 1811. There, his future biographer Johann Philipp Dieffenbach introduced him to the grand-ducal court at Darmstadt and to Princess Wilhelmine of Baden, who acted as a patron, placed small orders from him, and offered him later an annual salary. While hiking through the Odenwald and the valley of the river Neckar, Fohr executed a serial of preliminary sketches to the watercolors for the Skizzenbuch der Neckargegend, which was finalized in the winter of 1813/14 and dedicated to Princess Wilhelmine, offering pittoresque views, historical and fairy-tale subjects of the region. In 1814, he was part of Princess Wilhelmine's convoy to her summer-resort to the spa town of Baden-Baden. The Badisches Skizzenbuch, commissioned by Princess Wilhelmine, was a result of his tours through the Black Forest, containing pittoresque views e.g. of Kloster Lichtenthal, the burial place of the Margraves of Baden.

It was with Princess Wilhelmine's thereupon granted scholarship that Fohr went to Munich to study at the Academy of Fine Arts from July 1815 to May 1816. There he became friends with fellow student Ludwig Sigismund Ruhl, from whom he learned the basics of oil-painting.

Editorial summary

“Karl Philipp Fohr” enters the record as german painter (1795-1818). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Karl, Philipp and Fohr can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1795, 1818, 1810, 1811—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1795-11-26. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Karl, Philipp and Fohr.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Karl Philipp Fohr” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Karl, Philipp and Fohr provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q77762. VIAF identifies the subject as 77110139. The Library of Congress control number is n88676843. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1795, 1818, 1810 and 1811.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Karl Philipp Fohr”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Karl Philipp Fohr primary sources, Karl Philipp Fohr archive and Karl research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Karl Philipp Fohr”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Karl Philipp Fohr” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.