CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Isotopes of carbon

type of stable carbon atoms

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ471790
Source-derived summary

Carbon (6C) has 14 known isotopes, from 8C to 20C as well as 22C, of which only 12C and 13C are stable. The longest-lived radioisotope is 14C, with a half-life of 5700 years. This is also the only carbon radioisotope found in nature, as trace quantities are formed cosmogenically by the reaction 14N + n → 14C + 1H. The most stable artificial radioisotope is 11C, which has a half-life of 20.34 minutes. All other radioisotopes have half-lives under 20 seconds, most less than 200 milliseconds. Lighter isotopes exhibit beta-plus decay into isotopes of boron and heavier ones beta-minus decay into isotopes of nitrogen, though at the limits particle emission occurs as well. The two lightest isotopes decay into helium via short-lived isotopes of lithium, beryllium and boron.

List of isotopes

Carbon-11

Carbon-11 or 11C is a radioactive isotope of carbon that decays to boron-11 with a half-life to 20.34 minutes. This decay mainly occurs due to positron emission, with around 0.19–0.23% of decays instead occurring by electron capture.

11C → 11B + e+ + νe + 0.96 MeV

11C + e− → 11B + νe + 1.98 MeV

It is produced by hitting nitrogen with protons of around 16.5 MeV in a cyclotron. The causes the endothermic reaction

14N + p → 11C + 4He − 2.92 MeV

It can also be produced by fragmentation of 12C by shooting high-energy 12C at a target.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Isotopes of carbon” is type of stable carbon atoms. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Isotopes, carbon and type, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 235-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Isotopes, carbon and type is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “type of stable carbon atoms” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q471790. The Library of Congress control number is sh85020091. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of carbon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Isotopes of carbon primary sources, Isotopes of carbon archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of carbon”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Isotopes of carbon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.