CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cao Lộc

commune in Northeast, Vietnam

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ137667719 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cao Lộc is a commune (xã) of Lạng Sơn Province, Vietnam.

On July 1, 2025, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly issued Resolution No. 1672/NQ-UBTVQH15 on the reorganization of commune-level administrative units in Lạng Sơn Province in 2025. Accordingly, the entire natural area and population of Lộc Yên Commune, Thanh Lòa Commune, and Thạch Đạn Commune were reorganized to form a new commune named Cao Lộc Commune.

Editorial summary

“Cao Lộc” enters the record as commune in Northeast, Vietnam. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what commune, Northeast and Vietnam can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025, 1672—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around commune, Northeast and Vietnam.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cao Lộc” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, commune, Northeast and Vietnam provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137667719. Authority coordinates are 21.867, 106.768. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025 and 1672.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cao Lộc”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cao Lộc primary sources, Cao Lộc archive and commune research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cao Lộc”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cao Lộc” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.