CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Canebrake tree frogs

genus of amphibians

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ773535 ↗
Source-derived summary

The canebrake tree frogs are a frog genus Aplastodiscus. They are in the family Hylidae. Residing primarily in southeast regions of Brazil near the Atlantic coast. The exception is the Aplastodiscus perviridis which is found mostly in Brazil, but has also been documented being in Argentina, and might reside in Paraguay. The major revision of the Hylidae genus expanded it to include 12 more species originally from Hyla. Before the revision there were only 2 species. There are currently 16 described species with the most recent addition Aplastodiscus heterophonicus being described in 2021.

Species

There are currently 16 described species Aplastodiscus:

Aplastodiscus albofrenatus (A. Lutz, 1924)

Aplastodiscus albosignatus (A. Lutz and B. Lutz, 1938)

Aplastodiscus arildae (Cruz and Peixoto, 1987)

Aplastodiscus cavicola (Cruz and Peixoto, 1985)

Aplastodiscus cochranae (Mertens, 1952)

Aplastodiscus ehrhardti (Müller, 1924)

Aplastodiscus eugenioi (Carvalho-e-Silva and Carvalho-e-Silva, 2005)

Aplastodiscus flumineus (Cruz and Peixoto, 1985)

Aplastodiscus heterophonicus (Pinheiro, Pezzuti, Berneck, Lyra, Lima & Leite, 2021)

Aplastodiscus ibirapitanga (Cruz, Pimenta, and Silvano, 2003)

Aplastodiscus leucopygius (Cruz and Peixoto, 1985)

Aplastodiscus lutzorum (Berneck, Giaretta, Brandao, Cruz & Haddad, 2017)

Aplastodiscus musicus (B. Lutz, 1949)

Aplastodiscus perviridis (A. Lutz in B. Lutz, 1950)

Aplastodiscus sibilatus (Cruz, Pimenta, and Silvano, 2003)

Aplastodiscus weygoldti (Cruz and Peixoto, 1987)

Threats

Currently none of the species are threatened. Populations of some of the species are declining and the causes include residential and commercial development, human incursions and disturbance, natural systems modifications, agriculture and aquaculture, pollution, biological resource use, and invasive other problematic species, genes and diseases. Many of the species are data deficient, more research is needed to understand the accurate health of their species population.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Canebrake tree frogs” as genus of amphibians. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Canebrake, tree and frogs.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 1924, 1938, 1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Canebrake, tree and frogs providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Canebrake tree frogs”, the useful work is to connect “genus of amphibians” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q773535. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021, 1924, 1938 and 1987.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Canebrake tree frogs”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Canebrake tree frogs primary sources, Canebrake tree frogs archive and Canebrake research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Canebrake tree frogs”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Canebrake tree frogs” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.