CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cameraria hamameliella

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ5026072
Source-derived summary

Cameraria hamameliella is a moth of the family Gracillariidae. It is known from Ontario, Québec, and Nova Scotia in Canada and throughout the eastern United States.

The wingspan is about 7 mm (0.28 in).

The larvae feed on Hamamelis species, including Hamamelis virginiana. They mine the leaves of their host plant.

This species was first described by August Busck in 1903.

Editorial summary

“Cameraria hamameliella” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cameraria, hamameliella and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1903—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cameraria, hamameliella and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cameraria hamameliella” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cameraria, hamameliella and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5026072. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1903.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cameraria hamameliella”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cameraria hamameliella primary sources, Cameraria hamameliella archive and Cameraria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cameraria hamameliella”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cameraria hamameliella” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.