CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Aleuron iphis

species of moth

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ605158
Source-derived summary

Aleuron iphis is a moth of the family Sphingidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1856

Distribution

It is found from Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica to Venezuela, Bolivia and Brazil.

Description

The wingspan is 52–57 mm.

Biology

Adults are on wing from at least July to January in Costa Rica.

The larvae feed on Tetracera volubilis, Curatella americana and probably other Dilleniaceae species.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Aleuron iphis” as species of moth. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Aleuron, iphis and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1856—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Aleuron, iphis and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Aleuron iphis”, the useful work is to connect “species of moth” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q605158. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1856.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Aleuron iphis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Aleuron iphis primary sources, Aleuron iphis archive and Aleuron research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aleuron iphis”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Aleuron iphis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.