CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ59463
Source-derived summary

A calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion or Ca–Al-rich inclusion (CAI) is a submillimeter- to centimeter-sized light-colored calcium- and aluminium-rich inclusion found in carbonaceous chondrite meteorites. The first high-precision radiometric datings of CAIs involved four samples examined through the Pb–Pb chronometer, yielding a weighted mean age of 4567.30 ± 0.16 Ma. Subsequent studies including additional samples suggest a slightly older age of 4568.3 ± 0.7 Ma to rectify inconsistencies regarding Hf–W and Al–Mg chronometry methods. As CAIs are the oldest dated solids, this age is commonly used to define the age of the Solar System.

Description

CAIs consist of minerals that are among the first solids condensed from the cooling protoplanetary disk. They are thought to have formed as fine-grained condensates from a high temperature (>1300 K) gas that existed in the protoplanetary disk at early stages of Solar System formations. Some of them were probably remelted later resulting in distinct coarser textures. The most common and characteristic minerals in CAIs include anorthite, melilite, perovskite, aluminous spinel, hibonite, calcic pyroxene, and forsterite-rich olivine.

Using the lead-lead isotope chronometer ('Pb–Pb dating'), the absolute age of four CAIs have been calculated. They yield a weighted mean age of 4567.30 ± 0.16 Myr, which is often interpreted as representing the beginning of the formation of the planetary system (so-called 'CAI time-zero).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Calcium, aluminium-rich and inclusion, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1300—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Calcium, aluminium-rich and inclusion is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q59463. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1300.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion primary sources, Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion archive and Calcium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Calcium–aluminium-rich inclusion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.