CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cádiz Stradivarius

antique violin

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ5202318 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Cádiz Stradivarius of 1722 is an antique violin fabricated by Italian luthier Antonio Stradivari (1644–1737) of Cremona. The instrument is named after the city Cádiz, Spain where it resided for eighty years. In 1946 it was acquired by American violinist Joseph Fuchs, and is currently owned by a private American foundation. The Cádiz is on loan to violinist Jennifer Frautschi.

Editorial summary

“Cádiz Stradivarius” enters the record as antique violin. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cádiz, Stradivarius and antique can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1722, 1644, 1737, 1946—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1722. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cádiz, Stradivarius and antique.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cádiz Stradivarius” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cádiz, Stradivarius and antique provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5202318. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1722, 1644, 1737 and 1946.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cádiz Stradivarius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cádiz Stradivarius primary sources, Cádiz Stradivarius archive and Cádiz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cádiz Stradivarius”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cádiz Stradivarius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.