CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Tenebroides mauritanicus

species of beetle

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ1381403
Source-derived summary

Tenebroides mauritanicus, commonly known as the cadelle, is a species of beetle in the family Trogossitidae. It is a common cosmopolitan pest in storehouses and granaries.

Taxonomy and nomenclature

Tenebroides mauritanicus was first described in 1758 by Linnaeus in his 10th edition of Systema Naturae, who named it Tenebrio mauritanicus and classified it with the mealworms. A few decades later in 1790, the French entomologist Guillaume-Antoine Olivier proposed for it the generic name of Trogossite. For many years thereafter, the beetle was known as Trogosita mauritanica and was included in the family of beetles known as the Trogositidae.

In 1783, a specimen described under the name of Tenebroides complantus was recognised as Linnaeus’s original specimen of Tenebrio mauritanicus, leading to the proposal of the current name of Tenebroides mauritanicus.

The widely accepted common name cadelle comes from the French vernacular, and in its modern meaning refers to both adults and larvae.

The specific epithet mauritanicus means Mauritanian, in reference to the species’ supposed African origin.

The larvae were nicknamed "bargemen" by sailors because they often infested ships' biscuits and were noticed when they crawled out of the biscuits and onto the "barge", a small tub used to hold biscuits on the mess table.

Distribution and habitat

Having probably originated in North Africa, the cadelle has now spread through human agency to most other parts of the world in exported grain products and dunnage.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Tenebroides mauritanicus” is species of beetle. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Tenebroides, mauritanicus and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1758, 1790, 1783—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Tenebroides, mauritanicus and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of beetle” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1381403. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1758, 1790 and 1783.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tenebroides mauritanicus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tenebroides mauritanicus primary sources, Tenebroides mauritanicus archive and Tenebroides research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tenebroides mauritanicus”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tenebroides mauritanicus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.