Speedup
process for increasing the performance between two systems solving the same problem

In computer architecture, speedup is a number that measures the relative performance of two systems processing the same problem. More technically, it is the improvement in speed of execution of a task executed on two similar architectures with different resources. The notion of speedup was established by Amdahl's law, which was particularly focused on parallel processing. However, speedup can be used more generally to show the effect on performance after any resource enhancement.
Definitions
Speedup can be defined for two different types of quantities: latency and throughput.
Latency of an architecture is the reciprocal of the execution speed of a task:
L
=
1
v
=
T
W
,
{\displaystyle L={\frac {1}{v}}={\frac {T}{W}},}
where
v is the execution speed of the task;
T is the execution time of the task;
W is the execution workload of the task.
Throughput of an architecture is the execution rate of a task:
Q
=
ρ
v
A
=
ρ
A
W
T
=
ρ
A
L
,
{\displaystyle Q=\rho vA={\frac {\rho AW}{T}}={\frac {\rho A}{L}},}
where
ρ is the execution density (e.g., the number of stages in an instruction pipeline for a pipelined architecture);
A is the execution capacity (e.g., the number of processors for a parallel architecture).
Latency is often measured in seconds per unit of execution workload. Throughput is often measured in units of execution workload per second. Another unit of throughput is instructions per cycle (IPC) and its reciprocal, cycles per instruction (CPI), is another unit of latency.
The public source identifies “Speedup” as process for increasing the performance between two systems solving the same problem. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Speedup, process and increasing.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Speedup”, the useful work is to connect “process for increasing the performance between two systems solving the same problem” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1549489. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Speedup”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Speedup primary sources, Speedup archive and Speedup research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Speedup”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Speedup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.