CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla

government of Burkina Faso

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 20, 2025
Entity authorityQ117490776 ↗
Source-derived summary

Members of the Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla

Apollinaire Joachim Kyélem de Tambèla was appointed interim prime minister by interim president Ibrahim Traoré on October 21, 2022.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla” as government of Burkina Faso. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cabinet, Kyélem and Tambèla.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2022-10-25. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cabinet, Kyélem and Tambèla providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla”, the useful work is to connect “government of Burkina Faso” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q117490776. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla primary sources, Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla archive and Cabinet research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cabinet of Kyélem de Tambèla” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.