CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix

3×3 unitary matrix relating the mass eigenbasis of the three generations of quarks to the basis under which the weak interactions diagonalize

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ253728
Source-derived summary

In the Standard Model of particle physics, the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix, CKM matrix, quark mixing matrix, or KM matrix is a unitary matrix that contains information on the strength of the flavour-changing weak interaction. Technically, it specifies the mismatch of quantum states of quarks when they propagate freely and when they take part in the weak interactions. It is important in the understanding of CP violation. This matrix was introduced for three generations of quarks by Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa, adding one generation to the matrix previously introduced by Nicola Cabibbo. This matrix is also an extension of the GIM mechanism, which only includes two of the three current families of quarks.

Description

Predecessor: Cabibbo matrix

In 1963, Nicola Cabibbo introduced the Cabibbo angle (θc) to preserve the universality of the weak interaction.

Cabibbo was inspired by previous work by Murray Gell-Mann and Maurice Lévy,

on the effectively rotated nonstrange and strange vector and axial weak currents, which he references.

In light of current concepts (quarks had not yet been proposed), the Cabibbo angle is related to the relative probability that down and strange quarks decay into up quarks ( |Vud|2 and |Vus|2 , respectively). In particle physics terminology, the object that couples to the up quark via charged-current weak interaction is a superposition of down-type quarks, here denoted by d′.

Mathematically this is:

d

=

V

u

d

d

+

V

u

s

s

,

{\displaystyle d'=V_{\mathrm {ud} }\;d~~+~~V_{\mathrm {us} }\;s~,}

or using the Cabibbo angle:

d

=

cos

θ

c

d

+

sin

θ

c

s

.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix” as 3×3 unitary matrix relating the mass eigenbasis of the three generations of quarks to the basis under which the weak interactions diagonalize. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Cabibbo, Kobayashi and Maskawa can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as 3×3 unitary matrix relating the mass eigenbasis of the three generations of quarks to the basis under which the weak interactions diagonalize. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q253728. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1963.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix primary sources, Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix archive and Cabibbo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.