2C-T-36
chemical compound
2C-T-36, also known as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-(trifluoromethylsulfanyl)phenethylamine or 2C-T-TFM as well as CYB210010 or CYB2108, is a psychedelic drug of the phenethylamine and 2C families.
Use and effects
The properties and effects of 2C-T-36 in humans appear to be unknown.
Interactions
Pharmacology
Pharmacodynamics
2C-T-36 has a Ki of 0.35 nM at the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, and an EC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration of 4.1 nM at the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and 7.3 nM at the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor, compared to 88 nM at the serotonin 5-HT2B receptor. It is a potent, selective, long acting, and orally active agonist for the serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and produces psychedelic-like responding in several different animal species. The interactions of 2C-T-36 with numerous other receptors and targets have also been described.
Chemistry
Synthesis
The chemical synthesis of 2C-T-36 has been described.
Analogues
Analogues of 2C-T-36 (2C-T-TFM) include 2C-T-21 (2C-T-FE), 2C-T-21.5 (2C-T-DFE), 2C-T-22 (2C-T-TFE), 2C-T-28 (2C-T-FP), 2C-T-35 (2C-T-DFM), 2C-T, 2C-TFM, and 2C-TFE, among others. Some other analogues include 2C-Se-TFM, trifluoromescaline (TFM), 3C-TFE (3C-trifluoroescaline), and tiflorex (flutiorex). A deuterated isotopologue, CYB2108D (2C-T-36 with fully deuterated methoxy groups at 2 and 5 positions), is known.
History
Alexander Shulgin attempted to synthesise this compound in the 1990s, and mentions it in his book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved) under the entry for 2C-T-21, but was unsuccessful in producing a key intermediate and never assigned it a 2C-T number.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2C-T-36” as chemical compound. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as chemical compound. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q125935712. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2C-T-36”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2C-T-36 primary sources, 2C-T-36 archive and 2C-T-36 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2C-T-36”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2C-T-36” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.