CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg

organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ1054230
Source-derived summary

CLIPSAS (Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg) (English: "Liaison and Information Center of Masonic Powers Signatories of the Strasbourg Appeal") is an international Masonic organization that serves as the primary coordinating body for liberal Masonic activities. CLIPSAS was established in 1961 through the Strasbourg Appeal as a more inclusive alternative to the United Grand Lodge of England. The organization maintains Special Consultative Status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and comprises over 101 member obediences across four continents.

History

The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintained strict requirements regarding belief in a Supreme Being and prohibition of political and religious discussions.

On January 22, 1961, several sovereign Masonic obediences convened in Strasbourg to address these challenges. The original signatories include:

Grand Orient of Switzerland

Grand Orient of Austria

Grand Orient of Luxembourg

Serenísima Gran Logia de Lengua Española

Grand Orient of France

Grand Orient of Italy

Grand Orient of Belgium

Presidents

Current Member Obediences

CLIPSAS includes over 101 member obediences as of 2024 but shrunk to 91 denominations after the 2024 General Assembly in Albania.

Controversies and Criticism

Governance issues

During the 2022 General Assembly in Lisbon, Portugal, President Ivan Herrera Michel and the Grand Symbolic Lodge of Portugal reportedly had a lack of communication between members as many COVID-19 cases within the group were reported after the event. The organizers also used internet voting instead of using the usual voting system with terminals which led to confusion, notably when the voting for the inclusion of the Grand Orient of Andorra was reversed from their actual choice.

The assembly also had a reinstatement vote for the previously suspended Grand Orient of Mexico, in which the president reportedly left the room during vote to take a Covid PCR test for a flight.

Electoral Controversy of 2024

During the 2024 General Assembly in Durrës, Albania, Louis Daly won the election with only 32.06% of votes.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg” is organization. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Centre, Liaison and d'Information, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1961, 2024, 2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1961. For this dossier, Centre, Liaison and d'Information is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “organization” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1054230. VIAF identifies the subject as 298577468. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1961, 2024 and 2022.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg primary sources, Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg archive and Centre research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Centre de Liaison et d'Information des Puissances maçonniques Signataires de l'Appel de Strasbourg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.