CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit

DoD standard mapping toolkit for C2I software

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 6, 2024
Entity authorityQ5152504
Source-derived summary

The Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit, or CJMTK is the DoD standard mapping toolkit for DoD C2I Programs of Record. It is a replacement for the previous United States Department of Defense (DoD) Joint Mapping Toolkit (JMTK) that utilizes commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. The primary component of CJMTK is Esri's complete ArcGIS platform.

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) is the U.S. Government program manager for CJMTK. Program Management and Technical Support is contracted under the Sustained Analytic Services (SAS) Contract to Leidos. NGA licenses ArcGIS from Esri to provide the CJMTK across DoD C2I Programs. DoD C2I Programs of Record can obtain, develop on, and deploy CJMTK as part of their mission systems free of charge.

CJMTK is a collection of software developer components and end user applications used by developers to add geospatial capabilities to military mission applications. CJMTK is made up of components from Esri's Enterprise GIS Platform, ArcGIS, including ArcGIS Engine, ArcGIS Runtime, and ArcGIS Enterprise. CJMTK supports development for a range of platforms, including desktop, client/server, web-based, and mobile. The CJMTK also provides for development using a range of programming languages.

Editorial summary

“Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit” enters the record as doD standard mapping toolkit for C2I software. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Commercial, Joint and Mapping can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 184-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Commercial, Joint and Mapping.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Commercial, Joint and Mapping provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 6, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5152504. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit primary sources, Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit archive and Commercial research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Commercial Joint Mapping Toolkit” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.