CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

CEIM

organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ5782699
Source-derived summary

The Madrid Confederation of Employers and Industries (CEIM in its Spanish acronym) is an organization that represents the business owners of Madrid, Spain.

History

Several groups of business led by Max Mazin formed Independent Employers Association (AEI) and later Madrid Independent Employers Association (AEIM). In Madrid the Madrid Employers Federation (FEM) and Federation of Employers' Associations of Madrid (FAEM) joined with AEIM and formed CEIM on 28 February 1978. The first president was Jose Antonio Segurado.

Governance

Presidents

José Antonio Segurado (1978–1985)

Fernando Fernández-Tapias (1985–2002)

Gerardo Díaz Ferrán (2002–2007)

Arturo Ferández

Generals secretary

Agustin Mascareñas (1978–2000)

Alejandro Couceiro (2000- )

General Assembly

The representative organ of the Confederation. It is formed by organisations and companies.

Board of directors

It is formed by people chosen in General Assembly.

Executive committee

It is formed by the president, vice-president, the treasurer, the accountant and the representatives

Assessments

The board of assessors is formed by Advisory council, council of presidents, and the work commissions.

Advisory council

It assesses the president.

Council of presidents

The council of presidents comprises the regional and sectional presidents along with the national vice-president, Treasurer and Accountant.

Editorial summary

“CEIM” enters the record as organization. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what CEIM and organization can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 1985, 2002, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1978. Its strongest next move is a source search built around CEIM and organization.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“CEIM” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, CEIM and organization provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5782699. VIAF identifies the subject as 135224539. The Library of Congress control number is no2004102217. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1978, 1985, 2002 and 2007.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “CEIM”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow CEIM primary sources, CEIM archive and CEIM research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “CEIM”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from CEIM” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.