CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

FAA Order 8110.105

American regulatory order

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ85760192
Source-derived summary

FAA Order 8110.105B, Airborne Electronic Hardware Approval Guidelines is an explanation of how Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) personnel can use and apply the publication

DO-254, Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware, RTCA,

and the additional guidance and clarifications in advisory circular

AC 20-152A, Development Assurance for Airborne Electronic Hardware, FAA.

The order additionally identifies

AC 00-72, Best Practices for Airborne Electronic Hardware Design Assurance Using EUROCAE ED80() and RTCA DO 254(), FAA.

FAA Order 8110.105B defines a consistent process for certification authorities to follow when reviewing (auditing) airborne electronic hardware (AEH). To this end, this order concentrates on standardizing the number of audits to conduct and how much evidence to evaluate. This order includes worksheets that may be used to assess standardized certification authority Level of Involvement (LOI) in hardware projects.

Applicants developing under AC 20-152()/DO-254 may reference Order 8110.105B to be more informed of the number of certification liaison reviews to support and how much data is expected from them, determined by the level of involvement assessed by the certification authority.

Revision History

Revision B canceled 8110.105A and 8110.105, Simple and Complex Electronic Hardware Approval Guidance, which had different intent and content. The two cancelled revisions originally supplemented RTCA DO-254() by explaining to private users of that standard how FAA aircraft certification staff could use that document "when working on type certification projects". They covered "specific topics of interest to the FAA that may go above and beyond content specific to DO-254." As such, these revisions were recommended for reference by developers applying under DO-254() for certification of electronic hardware designs, including those implemented in "custom micro-coded components" (ie., ASICs, PLDs, or FPGAs). Of particular interest was clarification of the guidance in DO-245 on approving simple and complex components. The original publication also gave instructions on assessing level of FAA involvement in hardware projects and the means of staging involvement in a standardize series of reviews; however, the 2017 revision removed these instructions.

The order now only gives limited instructions on the Airborne Electronic Hardware Review Process to FAA staff and designees.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “FAA Order 8110.105” as american regulatory order. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Order, American and regulatory.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Order, American and regulatory providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “FAA Order 8110.105”, the useful work is to connect “american regulatory order” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q85760192. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “FAA Order 8110.105”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow FAA Order 8110.105 primary sources, FAA Order 8110.105 archive and Order research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “FAA Order 8110.105”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from FAA Order 8110.105” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.