CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

China–Africa Development Fund

organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ5099536
Source-derived summary

The China–Africa Development Fund (CAD Fund; Chinese: 中非发展基金) is a China Government Guidance Fund funded by China Development Bank. It invests in African projects across power generation, transportation infrastructure, natural resources, and manufacturing.

History

The fund was announced by General Secretary Hu Jintao at the November 2006 Beijing summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation as one of the "Eight Measures" for Sino-African relations. It launched in June 2007 with US$1 billion from China Development Bank. A second fundraising round began in May 2010 targeting US$2 billion, and in 2015 China announced plans to expand the fund to US$10 billion.

Investment approach

The fund selects projects based on commercial merit rather than by country, targeting sectors critical to African development such as agriculture, manufacturing, and infrastructure. Primary recipients are Chinese enterprises operating in Africa. The Chinese government exempts the fund from corporate income tax on African investment earnings.

The fund also supports Chinese special economic zones in Africa through grants, loans, and subsidies, though the Chinese government generally leaves zone development to enterprises working directly with host countries.

Investments

Jidong Cement plant (2010): Contributed 382.5 million ZAR toward a 1.65 billion ZAR Jidong Cement plant in Limpopo.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “China–Africa Development Fund” as organization. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around China, Africa and Development.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2007, 2010, 2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2007. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with China, Africa and Development providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “China–Africa Development Fund”, the useful work is to connect “organization” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5099536. 1 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 3 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2007, 2010 and 2015.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “China–Africa Development Fund”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow China–Africa Development Fund primary sources, China–Africa Development Fund archive and China research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “China–Africa Development Fund”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from China–Africa Development Fund” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.