Lu 35-138
chemical compound

Lu 35-138 is a dual dopamine D4 receptor antagonist and serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI), among other actions, which was under development for the treatment of schizophrenia but was never marketed. Its route of administration is unspecified.
The drug shows high affinity for the dopamine D4 receptor (Ki = 5 nM) and is a competitive antagonist of this receptor (Kb = 8 nM). In addition, it is a potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor, with an IC50Tooltip half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 3.2 nM. Subsequent research found that Lu 35-138 is a potent negative allosteric modulator or allosteric inhibitor of the serotonin transporter (SERT), with an IC50 of 43.8 nM in the later study. Lu 35-138 also shows affinity for the α1-adrenergic receptor (Ki = 45 nM). Its affinities for various other monoamine receptors have been reported as well, for instance at the dopamine D2 receptor (Ki = 72 nM; 14.4-fold lower than for the dopamine D4 receptor) and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor (Ki = 260 nM), with significant dopamine D2 receptor occupancy notably observed in vivo in rodents. In addition to its actions at monoaminergic targets, Lu 35-138 is a hERG blocker, with an IC50 of 270 nM. For comparison, haloperidol and sertindole had IC50 values for this action of 170 nM and 64 nM, respectively.
Similarly to many antidepressants, Lu 35-138 produces antiaggressive effects acutely and proaggressive effects with chronic administration in rodents. It reverses the hyperlocomotion induced by dextroamphetamine and phencyclidine (PCP) in rodents. However, it was unable to affect the hyperlocomotion induced by a high dose of dextroamphetamine, which was said to reflect a preferential action on limbic versus striatal structures.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Lu 35-138” as chemical compound. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as chemical compound. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140563762. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lu 35-138”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lu 35-138 primary sources, Lu 35-138 archive and 35-138 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lu 35-138”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lu 35-138” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.