CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

C-Repeat Binding Factor

transcription factor

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ5005910
Source-derived summary

C-Repeat Binding Factors (CBFs) are transcription factors in plants involved in response to low temperature.

Also known as Dehydration Response Element Binding factors (DREBs), they are a subfamily of AP2 DNA-binding domain transcription factors. Mutation studies on CBF genes in Arabidopsis thaliana have shown significant effects on sensitivity to both freezing and salinity.

References

Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J. & Thomashow, M.F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

Editorial summary

“C-Repeat Binding Factor” enters the record as transcription factor. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what C-Repeat, Binding and Factor can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around C-Repeat, Binding and Factor.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“C-Repeat Binding Factor” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, C-Repeat, Binding and Factor provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5005910. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “C-Repeat Binding Factor”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow C-Repeat Binding Factor primary sources, C-Repeat Binding Factor archive and C-Repeat research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “C-Repeat Binding Factor”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from C-Repeat Binding Factor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.