CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

FC Bugeac Comrat

association football club in Moldova

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ112108984 ↗
Source-derived summary

FC Bugeac Comrat was a Moldovan football club based in Comrat, Moldova. They played in the Moldovan National Division, the first tier of Moldovan football.

History

The club was founded in 1991. It played one season in the fourth tier of the Soviet league system. In 1992, Bugeac won the first edition of the Moldovan Cup. The club played five seasons in the Moldovan National Division before it was dissolved in 1996.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “FC Bugeac Comrat” as association football club in Moldova. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bugeac, Comrat and association.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991, 1992, 1996—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bugeac, Comrat and association providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “FC Bugeac Comrat”, the useful work is to connect “association football club in Moldova” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q112108984. The first chronological checks are 1991, 1992 and 1996.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “FC Bugeac Comrat”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow FC Bugeac Comrat primary sources, FC Bugeac Comrat archive and Bugeac research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “FC Bugeac Comrat”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “FC Bugeac Comrat” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.