CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bucket of Tongues

1992 short story collection by Duncan McLean

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ4983030
Source-derived summary

Bucket of Tongues is a collection of twenty-three short stories by the Scottish writer Duncan McLean. Published in 1992, it was McLean's first book. McLean won the Somerset Maugham Award in 1993 for the collection.

Stories

Themes

Erich Hertz wrote in the Scottish Literary Review that Bucket of Tongues opens with an incident where a home has been broken into or is "perceived as in some way violated". Hertz argues that the break-in, or the imminent commination, and the "onslaught on domestic safety perpetrated by it, can be seen as symptomatic of a larger, all-embracing anxiety at a national level". He says there is a metaphor at play here, in that the "lack of security at the domicile portrays a similar concern about the lack of stability in the homeland [Scotland]".

Reviews

Publishers Weekly wrote that the "characters in these 23 short stories shiver through the night and squabble the day away" ... and that McLean's characters "wade through dire straits with the wide ironic grins of those whose facade of cockiness might at any moment crack". Overall, they opine that McClean's writing is "clean sober prose with sharp accurate descriptions of the natural world". Diana Casey of the Guide to Literary Masters & Their Works says this collection of short stories is "particularly intense and raw" ...

Editorial summary

“Bucket of Tongues” enters the record as 1992 short story collection by Duncan McLean. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bucket, Tongues and short can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 1993—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1992-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bucket, Tongues and short.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Bucket of Tongues” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bucket, Tongues and short provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4983030. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1992 and 1993.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bucket of Tongues”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bucket of Tongues primary sources, Bucket of Tongues archive and Bucket research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bucket of Tongues”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bucket of Tongues” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.